USABILITY OF LITERATURE

Death
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on tumblr

Alvin Kernan

Alvin Kernan, Prof. of Humanities, Princeton University in his Death of Literature (1990) calls literature as a ‘piece of useless logwood.’ And he cited roughly three major reasons for the demise of literature. They are: people have no time and inclination to read, rise of extreme theorization in literature, rise of coca-cola culture. Now I attempt to elaborate this serious issue with my common sense and practical experiences.

Development Game:

In neocolonial or present globalised world economic considerations direct our leaders and policymakers to chart the route of development. Basically development in the present Indian context means displacement of the poor, the marginalized, and the disadvantaged from their lands of inheritance, and then gift that grabbed lands to multinational companies. As a repayment the companies will donate big moneys to parties of their favour. And the parties will spend the funds to shine its electoral prospects and rule us.

Usability of literature:

In this scheme of things literature has little role to play. Here comes the major role of science, commerce and technology. And we are really benefitting from the application of science and technology in our private and public life—from using pampers and sanitary napkins to landing on Mars and Moon, from using foam to shave to arming us with missiles and nuclear weapons. It suggests the usability of things. Articles or knowledge of any stream which has a specific use is in high demand. For instance, trained drivers, workmen, guards, repairmen have no empty hands, whereas many Ph.Ds are seeking a job of a sweeper or water bearer. Thus literature and arts people are useless beings who have a limited scope to serve the nation. Moreover, they are ‘rabble-rousers’ who complain and even protest against any development agenda taken by the Govt. They are often subversive. They lack open eyes. They cannot guard our borders, cannot contribute to GDP. So what is their usability?

 Uselessness of Literature:

Literature explores one’s imaginative and creative faculty. Its field is the intricate hoary mind. However, some people are making use of their brain in theorizing literature. But in planning and executing any development agenda they are never consulted by the parties involved. A village headman is more important than a high profile literary theoretician.  Because that man has sway over a thousand people whereas theoretician’s books lie dusted in a corner of a big library. What literature contributes is a chastened and cultural mind. But this age is for the savage heads, foul mouths, not for the noble minds and chastened souls. So literature is useless.

 Mediocre? :

Literature as subject has no demand. We say the best brains will either join medical or IITs. And there is also the brain drain aspect. So among those who are left will do science and computer and business things. Now who are left? The mediocre. And they generally take these arts subject. So they are the worst boys and the girls both in merit and upbringing. The culture of first boys has relegated them to the lower rungs of the educational system. Many big educational columnists hardly know their presence. Because India is to them is a country of the first boys or girls. They hardly know the root of the malaise which cripples this vast number of semi-urban and provincial pupils. Their lectures and talks are superficial par excellence. Such shallow deliberations on print and electronic media have been doing more harm to the first generation learners of our country. And of course they are in majority. They have no infrastructure facility, no money. Many come only for midday meals.  Learning is meaningless to an empty stomach.

Sailing with the Wind:

In conclusion I must say that as literature Arts in general fail to sing with the corporate wings and winds, it ceases to be a key area of cultivation, and it does not attract the best minds. In our tik-tok video age it hardly has any relevance to Gen Next whose only aspiration in life is to become rich by overnight. Literature is not conducive to earning money. It is basically a field where the searches of a soul stops.

Share This

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on tumblr
Abu Siddik

Abu Siddik

It's all about the unsung , nameless men and women around us. I try to portray them through my tales. I praise their undying suffering and immaculate beauty. And their resilience to life's vicissitudes, oddities, and crudities I admire. They are my soulmates who inspire me to look beyond the visible, the known, the common facade of the educated and the intellectuals.

Related Posts

This Post Has 2 Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Categories

Top Comments

Subhash Chandra
Read More
"A gifted writer"

A gifted versetile writer who writes excellent stories and poems on the invisibles, pariahs, margins, aged, weaklings of our society. A rising star on the literary firmament.
Santosh Bakaya
Read More
Praise for my writing

“Your story Undersell left me with a lump in my throat, so did your poem, He also lights candles.”
Louis Kasatkin
Read More
Praise for my poem "Elderly Men Two"

"A finely honed observational piece recording the minutiae of everyday life. Rendered with the author’s customary poetic aplomb suffused with a Borges like quality of the mythic."